Another "vaccine" that must be rejected. And several reasons why. Indian company Bharat Biotech — global top exporter of "vaccines" for COVID, launches 1st nasal spray "vaccine"
Maybe WHO failed them because it wouldn't kill enough people and its too cheap. I’d take a nasal spray over an injection any day (not that I would take either). And no live virus like the nasal flu vax
Easy way oout: 100 millions of years, upon falling ill, all social living mammals retreat by instinct, to protect the family/group from infection, and, upon feeling better, come back and SHED broken pathogens in sub-infectious dosing to the group, donating PRE-IMMUNITY.
Some ca. 3 rounds of shedding later, one may well develop STERILISING IMMUNITY just upon sub-infectious shedding reception.
So how many minutes do you think some village physician or lab tech or private person does need to take some freshly infected's snot, sterilise it, filtrate, and fill it into a nasal spray?
I think with routine, I will do it on the fly in 1 minute.
Any inorganic antiseptic is able to sterlisise in 1min., one can add a drop into the ready spray (low dose, as it soothes the immune system, which is what we now do not want to have).
NO ADJUVANS:
Still, my firm belief is that I rather emulate being naturally shed to, by say 1 week 4x/day spraying the sterilised pathogen to my nose, in ultra low dose, than introduce any kind of "booster", aka, adjuvans, and may it be plant based, which is in principle some cool idea (M@trix-M being the one innovation of Novavx).
We just have to avoid what we see now in the x-times (x->inf.) boostered persons: TOLERANCE, which is very detrimental, and I just want to know how to help the boostered to get rid of it. Perhaps some detox, rehab like from heroine;)
Since the procedure of "being shed to" is in "field test" or rather, as all plants and animals, was there BEFORE us humans, for some hundred millions of years now, I think, limiting the spray use to a week will be safe. To emulate it perfectly, one could even use waning doses there, but I think it is not necessary. Shedding is often very random, as we meet someone a few times, than not for a week, then his-her residual broken pathogens are all detoxed out.
Maybe WHO failed them because it wouldn't kill enough people and its too cheap. I’d take a nasal spray over an injection any day (not that I would take either). And no live virus like the nasal flu vax
Maybe WHO failed them because it wouldn't kill enough people and its too cheap. I’d take a nasal spray over an injection any day (not that I would take either). And no live virus like the nasal flu vax
Pass. I don’t think i’ll ever accept a “vaccine” ever again but will rely on my immune system. Pharmaceuticals are dead to me
Maybe WHO failed them because it wouldn't kill enough people and its too cheap. I’d take a nasal spray over an injection any day (not that I would take either). And no live virus like the nasal flu vax
Nope. Hard pass. Will the FDA approve? We already have nasal flu vaccines -- have had for years, so I imagine they absolutely will.
Easy way oout: 100 millions of years, upon falling ill, all social living mammals retreat by instinct, to protect the family/group from infection, and, upon feeling better, come back and SHED broken pathogens in sub-infectious dosing to the group, donating PRE-IMMUNITY.
Some ca. 3 rounds of shedding later, one may well develop STERILISING IMMUNITY just upon sub-infectious shedding reception.
So how many minutes do you think some village physician or lab tech or private person does need to take some freshly infected's snot, sterilise it, filtrate, and fill it into a nasal spray?
I think with routine, I will do it on the fly in 1 minute.
Any inorganic antiseptic is able to sterlisise in 1min., one can add a drop into the ready spray (low dose, as it soothes the immune system, which is what we now do not want to have).
NO ADJUVANS:
Still, my firm belief is that I rather emulate being naturally shed to, by say 1 week 4x/day spraying the sterilised pathogen to my nose, in ultra low dose, than introduce any kind of "booster", aka, adjuvans, and may it be plant based, which is in principle some cool idea (M@trix-M being the one innovation of Novavx).
We just have to avoid what we see now in the x-times (x->inf.) boostered persons: TOLERANCE, which is very detrimental, and I just want to know how to help the boostered to get rid of it. Perhaps some detox, rehab like from heroine;)
Since the procedure of "being shed to" is in "field test" or rather, as all plants and animals, was there BEFORE us humans, for some hundred millions of years now, I think, limiting the spray use to a week will be safe. To emulate it perfectly, one could even use waning doses there, but I think it is not necessary. Shedding is often very random, as we meet someone a few times, than not for a week, then his-her residual broken pathogens are all detoxed out.
Maybe WHO failed them because it wouldn't kill enough people and its too cheap. I’d take a nasal spray over an injection any day (not that I would take either). And no live virus like the nasal flu vax
Maybe WHO failed them because it wouldn't kill enough people and its too cheap. I’d take a nasal spray over an injection any day (not that I would take either). And no live virus like the nasal flu vax